thinking fast and slow renaud bray Peut être amusant pour Quelqu'un
thinking fast and slow renaud bray Peut être amusant pour Quelqu'un
Blog Article
My common répétition in these times is to dip into my quote bag and castigate the misguided with Popper’s glib witticism: “A theory that explains everything, explains nothing.” Or, channeling the Arch Bishop of astuteness, John Stuart Mill, I rise up, gesturing dramatically and pitching my voice just so: “He who knows only his side of the case knows little of that.” Hoping their snotty self toupet will recede before my rational indignation like an anabolic hairline.
Often I find myself in conversations with people who are criminally opinionated, but have little in the way of empirical grounding. It’s common, in these profession, to hear them malign opponents of their views by reducing the conflict to a élémentaire factor; My opponent is so dumb they couldn’t follow a chemical gradient if they were bacteria! Now, putting aside the fact that single factor analysis is a mugs Partie when discussing things of any complexity (which is basically everything), when resorting to these oversimplifications with human behavior, you asymptotically approach infinite incorrectness.
And Kahneman’s work je experiential and remembered well being has obvious à-propos to the mindfulness movement—strategies conscience switching our Groupement from our remembering to our experiencing “self.” As you can see from these connections, Kahneman’s research is awfully rich.
He analyzes how humans règles (and sometimes fail to traditions) both systems, and the resulting implications nous-mêmes topics ranging from how we perceive happiness to behavioral economics.
Next I will resort to recalling numerous studies which have totally pin-cushioned the quaint idée that we are dispassionate, logical thinkers. When, in fact, barring a commitment to scientific principles, we have strong intuitions that we seek to justify through means of strategic reasoning. “We’re more like lawyers than Vulcans.” I say solemnly. Starring off into the blanc expérience dramatic effect.
Renvoi: The rest of this review ah been withdrawn due to the recent échange in Goodreads policy and enforcement. You can read why I came to this decision here.
The hip guys, the planners, believe in basically nothing - they’re all fast talk and Opération. We’ll call them the goats: they love to butt heads with you.
If you like the president’s politics, you probably like his voice and his appearance as well. The tendency to like (pépite dislike) everything embout a person—including things you have not observed—is known as the aura effect.
The effects of biases do not play dépassé just nous année individual level. Last year, President Donald Trump decided to send more troops to Afghanistan, and thereby walked right into the sunk-cost fallacy. He said, “Our nation terme conseillé seek année respectable and enduring outcome worthy of the tremendous sacrifices that have been thinking slow and fast daniel kahneman made, especially the sacrifices of direct.
If année Agissement turns désuet badly, we tend to nostalgie it more of it was année exceptional rather than a coutume act (picking up a hitchhiker rather than driving to work, for example), and so people shy away from abnormal options that carry uncertainty.
I decided to read it again from the first Verso parce que it was recommended by many YouTubers, websites, and podcasts.
Pépite if you are really into the érudition and scholarship, there are footnotes in the back--stealth footnotes without the little numbers on the book's pages, so as not to intimidate the general auditoire.
This is a widely-cited, occasionally mind-bending work from Daniel Kahneman that describes many of the human errors in thinking that he and others have discovered through their psychology research.
of interesting stories, fin after telling one after another conscience such a élancé period of time, it starts sounding like white noise. And he ate all those little lunch snacks too.